Sunday 29 July 2012

Assam / Myanmar

bdesh immigrants sc to examine their citizenship status
Questions of North east India
Namrata Goswami - IDSA report-Assam in Turmoil
Assam and Aftermath
DHD (N) and UPDS Agree to Ceasefire
‘Peace Talks’ in Assam’s Post Election Scenario
Terrorism and Electoral Politics in Assam
The Culture of Bandhs and the Absence of Local Governance in the Northea
Talks with the ULFA Beyond Rhetoric to Substance

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/un-seeks-inquiry-on-rakhine-violence-in-burma/981097/
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has called for an independent investigation after claims of abuses by security forces in Burma''s Rakhine state.
Pillay said that forces sent to quash violence in the northern state were reported to be targeting Muslims.
The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) said that about 80,000 people have been displaced following inter-communal violence.
The agency said most of those displaced are living in camps and more tents are being airlifted in to help them.
The latest violence in Rakhine began in May when a Buddhist ethnic Rakhine woman was raped and murdered by three Muslims.On 3 June, an unidentified mob killed 10 Muslims.
Pillay''s office said that since then at least 78 people have been killed in ensuing violence but unofficial estimates are higher.
"We have been receiving a stream of reports from independent sources alleging discriminatory and arbitrary responses by security forces, and even their instigation of and involvement in clashes,” Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said.
“Reports indicate that the initial swift response of the authorities to the communal violence may have turned into a crackdown targeting Muslims, in particular members of the Rohingya community,” Pillay added.
She welcomed a government decision to allow a UN envoy access to Rakhine state next week, but said it was 'no substitute for a fully-fledged independent investigation'.

http://www.rfa.org/english/news/burma/rohingya-07292012180317.html

UN Seeks Probe Into Rakhine Crisis
2012-07-29
A UN expert is to make a trip to Burma's volatile Rakhine state to investigate recent violence.





Saturday 28 July 2012

Fringe and the Mainstream

Togadia on Hindutva Storm


 All those who opposed Hindutva, and this certainly included secularists, would get the "death sentence'' he declared. But the VHP would not have to carry out the sentence, the people would. "All Hindutva opponents will get the death sentence and we will leave it to the people to carry this out,'' he said.
Prior to 1989, the BJP itself was a "political untouchable," but that was not the case now, the coalition National Democratic Alliance Government was proof of this. However, even after the NDA took birth the BJP's Hindutva agenda remained "untouchable". Mr. Togadia and the VHP would set that right. It had already been set right in Gujarat where "our Hindutva agenda has become touchable (acceptable),'' he argued.
Gujarat had, in fact, "finished the credibility of the secularists''. They had described the Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi, as `khalnayak' (villain) but the people saw him as a hero. Those who had said that the VHP belonged to the `lunatic fringe' were wrong. "I have moved centre-stage, and they (secularists) have become the impotent fringe.'' 
How Anti Semitism is becoming Mainstream












Tagore and hindutva

Cultivating Humanity and World Citizenship


http://ucl.academia.edu/CollinsMichael/Papers/948542/Rabindranath_Tagore_at_150_Representations_and_Misrepresentations


I am scandalized. This is what I came across today


Rabindranath Tagore and sickularism

An extract from the above

Rabindranath Tagore as an intellectual of high order was deeply derisive of sickular thinking. 
Today, Tagore's Gitanjali wont pass the sickular test, let alone win the Nobel Prize. In Gitanjali, Tagore envisaged an India “.Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit”.
Tagore envisaged an India where native Dharma (clear stream of reason, river metaphor) trumps desert dogmas - islam, christianity (dreary desert sand of dead habits); very reverse of sickularism.
Tagore did not leave anyone in doubt where he stood on the issue of Hindutva. In his remarkable work, Sandip’s story, one can see how derisive, Tagore was on sicko thinking, completely demolishing it.
Clicking on Sandip's story leads to this extract from Ghare Baire
Our work proceeds apace. But though we have shouted ourselves hoarse, proclaiming the Mussulmans to be our brethren, we have come to realize that we shall never be able to bring them wholly round to our side. So they must be suppressed altogether and made to understand that we are the masters. They are now showing their teeth, but one day they shall dance like tame bears to the tune we play.
"If the idea of a United India is a true one," objects Nikhil, "Mussulmans are a necessary part of it."
"Quite so," said I, "but we must know their place and keep them there, otherwise they will constantly be giving trouble."
Someone completely unfamiliar with Tagore or Ghare Baire is likely to think Sandip represents Tagore's views. I think that Ghare Baire explores the flip side of mass movements. It is Nikhil who voices Tagore's views 
"So you want to make trouble to prevent trouble?"
"What, then, is your plan?"
"There is only one well-known way of avoiding quarrels," said Nikhil meaningly.
I know that, like tales written by good people, Nikhil's discourse always ends in a moral. The strange part of it is that with all his familiarity with moral precepts, he still believes in them! He is an incorrigible schoolboy. His only merit is his sincerity. The mischief with people like him is that they will not admit the finality even of death, but keep their eyes always fixed on a hereafter.
I have long been nursing a plan which, if only I could carry it out, would set fire to the whole country. True patriotism will never be roused in our countrymen unless they can visualize the motherland. We must make a goddess of her. My colleagues saw the point at once. "Let us devise an appropriate image!" they exclaimed. "It will not do if you devise-- it," I admonished them. "We must get one of the current images accepted as representing the country--the worship of the people must flow towards it along the deep-cut grooves of custom."
But Nikhil's needs must argue even about this. "We must not seek the help of illusions," he said to me some time ago, "for what we believe to be the true cause."
"Illusions are necessary for lesser minds," I said, "and to this class the greater portion of the world belongs. That is why divinities are set up in every country to keep up the illusions of the people, for men are only too well aware of their weakness."
"No," he replied. "God is necessary to clear away our illusions. The divinities which keep them alive are false gods."
Here is the link to the full book in this Writings of Tagore Here is Amartya Sen on Tagore

Now another gem based on work by Arun Shourie and his team http://zoomindianmedia.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/decode-sickular-lies-on-indian-history/

From a review of Shourie's book
The largely Marxist membership of the Indian Council of Historical Research appointed by the socialistic Congress party, which was in power for nearly all of the fifty years since independence, was reconstituted in July 1998 by the Bharatiya Janata Party, currently ruling at the center. Unfortunately, it will take a long time for undoing the harm done by the Marxist historians to the Indian psyche: "they have used these institutions to sow in the minds of our people [the Hindus] the seeds of self-hatred."

 K,N.Panikkar's oft quoted response to Shourie

Arun Shourie is not a historian. He is a mythologist of Hindu communalism. He is a political pornographer.
Here is another extract  http://www.indowindow.com/akhbar/article.php?article=135&category=6&issue=19

Ten year old article written in 2002. 

Friday 20 July 2012

Mein Kampf to be published by Bavaria?

The Bavarian Government plans to publish Hitler's Mein Kampf

See also http://www.cbc.ca/books/2012/07/is-germany-ready-for-the-return-of-mein-kampf.html

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/06/17/3098456/german-plans-for-mein-kampf-excerpts-in-schools-seen-as-a-way-to-demystify-hitler-tome

Accordingly, the book “is one of the most purchased in the world; more than 12 million copies have been sold. Here, where it was banned, people have read it secretly.”


People “could have known” what was coming if they read “Mein Kampf,” said teacher Annette Zschatzsch, looking at the display with her students. “But people did not read it.”

 
Are influential books really read?

Out of Body Experiences

http://desicontrarian.wordpress.com/

I thought "out of body experiences" are fairly common. At least I started having such experiences just after my father's death nearly 3 decades ago. So in my case it was brought on by trauma and I struggled with it over next few years till I learnt how to enter and come out of such a state. Those states earlier were accompanied by extreme horror till I made it into an entertainment just to escape! Being a scientist, ofcourse I looked for scientific explanations and I had first hand experiences too. May be I will blog it.

I just remember an incident. A colleague was talking about fantastic account of OBE in some book. So I asked, what of it? I have had it hundreds of times. He was so shocked and didn't ask me about my experiences at all. So much mystification goes on!

I was unaware of Open magazine article and the TIFR talk. But I was aware of Susan Blackmore's work because it matched with my conclusions.

I am aware of what they call siddhi etc associated with this state.

I had started collecting in one place what many writers have written about this state ( I have already put some by Dostoyesky and by Doris Lessing. I want to put some more by the same writers and also by Thomas Mann. ) My blog
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is what I discovered on net and absolutely demystifying and true

http://clatko.tumblr.com/post/44917963887/neuromorphogenesis-trick-yourself-into-an





Trick yourself into an out-of-body experience

Your mind isn’t as firmly anchored in your body as you think. Time for some sleight of hand
CLOSE your eyes and ask yourself: where am I? Not geographically, but existentially. Most of the time, we would say that we are inside our bodies. After all, we peer out at the world from a unique, first-person perspective within our heads – and we take it for granted.
We wouldn’t be so sanguine if we knew that this feeling of inhabiting a body is something the brain is constantly constructing. But the fact that we live inside our bodies doesn’t mean that our sense of self is confined to its borders – as these next examples show.

Sleight of (rubber) hand

By staging experiments that manipulate the senses, we can explore how the brain draws – and redraws – the contours of where our selves reside.
One of the simplest ways to see this in action is via an experiment that’s now part of neuroscience folklore: the rubber hand illusion. The set up is simple: a person’s hand is hidden from their view by a screen while a rubber hand is placed on the table in front of them. By stroking their hand while they see the rubber hand being stroked, you can make them feel that the fake hand is theirs (see diagram).
Why does this happen? The brain integrates various senses to create aspects of our bodily self. In the rubber hand illusion, the brain is processing touch, vision and proprioception – the internal sense of the relative location of our body parts. Given the conflicting information, the brain resolves it by taking ownership of the rubber hand.
The implication is that the boundaries of the self sketched out by the brain can easily expand to include a foreign object. And the self’s peculiar meanderings outside the body don’t end there.

Trading places

Ever wish you had someone else’s body? The brain can make it happen. To show how, Henrik Ehrsson at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, and colleagues transported people out of their own bodies and into a life-size mannequin.
The mannequin had cameras for eyes, and whatever it was “seeing” was fed into a head-mounted display worn by a volunteer. In this case, the mannequin’s gaze was pointed down at its abdomen. When the researchers stroked the abdomens of both the volunteer and the mannequin at the same time, many identified with the mannequin’s body as if it was their own.
In 2011, the team repeated the experiment, but this time while monitoring the brain activity of volunteers lying in an fMRI scanner. They found that activity in certain areas of the frontal and parietal lobes correlated with the changing sense of body ownership.
So what’s happening? Studies of macaque monkeys show us that these brain regions contain neurons that integrate vision, touch and proprioception. Ehrsson thinks that in the human brain such neurons fire only when there are synchronous touches and visual sensations in the immediate space around the body, suggesting that they play a role in constructing our sense of body ownership. Mess with the information the brain receives, and you can mess with this feeling of body ownership.
Yet while Ehrsson’s study manipulated body ownership, the person “inside” the mannequin still had a first-person perspective – their self was still located within a body, even if it wasn’t their own. Could it be possible to wander somewhere where there is no body at all?

Into thin air

Your self even can be tricked into hovering in mid-air outside the body. In 2011, Olaf Blanke at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) in Lausanne and colleagues asked volunteers to lie on their backs and via a headset watch a video of a person of similar appearance being stroked on the back. Meanwhile, a robotic arm installed within the bed stroked the volunteer’s back in the same way.
The experience that people described was significantly more immersive than simply watching a movie of someone else’s body. Volunteers felt they were floating above their own body, and a few experienced a particularly strange effect. Despite the fact that they were all lying facing upwards, some felt they were floating face down so they could watch their own back (see “Leaving the body”). “I was looking at my own body from above,” said one participant. “The perception of being apart from my own body was a bit weak but still there.”
“That was for us really exciting, because it gets really close to the classical out-of-body experience of looking down at your own body,” says team member Bigna Lenggenhager, now at the University of Bern in Switzerland. Further support came by repeating the experiment inside an MRI scanner, which showed a brain region called the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) behaving differently when people said they were drifting outside their bodies. This ties in neatly with previous studies of brain lesions in people who reported out-of-body experiences, which also implicated the TPJ.
The TPJ shares a common trait with other brain regions that researchers believe are associated with body illusions: it helps to integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive senses with the signals from the inner ear that give us our sense of balance and spatial orientation. This provides more evidence that the brain’s ability to integrate various sensory stimuli plays a key role in locating the self in the body.
According to philosopher Thomas Metzinger of the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany, understanding how the brain performs this trick is the first step to understanding how the brain puts together our autobiographical self – the sense we have of ourselves as entities that exist from a remembered past to an imagined future. “These experiments are very telling, because they manipulate low-level dimensions of the self: self-location and self-identification,” he says. The feeling of owning and being in a body is perhaps the most basic facet of self-consciousness, and so could be the foundation on which more complex aspects of the self are built. The body, it seems, begets the self.


Wednesday 11 July 2012

Self Regulation?

There could be a simpler and less taxing code of conduct for bloggers, with a brief on line course which they could complete, after which they could mention adherence to the code on their blog. They should be given the opportunity of ethics advice and a quick adjudication of complaints rather than having to go through litigation. Quick remedies such as retractions could be mandated. For recalcitrant contributors, the dispute resolution process could generate compulsory „product warnings‟ on each blog.
http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/142725/Institute-for-Ethics-Governance-and-Law.pdf